Posts Tagged ‘zero down’
Monday, October 6th, 2008
So I haven’t posted in over a week, and it’s been because i’ve had my head down working like a dog while reeling from the effects of the last week’s meltdown in the financial sector. Finally, after an up and down week, and Fed in the US approved the bailout. You would think that this is great news for the real estate industry, right?
I’m not so sure. What this plan effectively did is nationalize a private problem. There is a saying somewhere that when profits are made they are private, but when losses are taken, they’re public. I know that isn’t a direct quote, but it is close enough to get the gist of it. It is also very very true. So long as the market continued along unabated, with profits being made, private investors got to keep all their profits, spend it as they wished, and not have to pay anything other than taxes. When the problems set in, and the investors all stood to lose a lot of money, enter the Fed and a massive public bailout that effectively increases the national debt that took them over 100 years to build by 10% in a single blow. I don’t like the precedent that this sets, and hope that the bailout doesn’t totally bail out all the lenders and institutions that acted irresponsibly over the past 8 years. That said, I also don’t want the market to go into a tailspin and melt down.
A lot of the price appreciation we have seen in Vancouver Real Estate in the past few years is driven by the market being very desirable to live in, own in, and even rent in. As a result, prices have (and should have) risen. However, as someone on the front lines of mortgages and real estate, I DO think that prices have gotten ahead of value, and we are in for a correction.
Unlike the United States market, however, I do NOT think that prices will come crashing down around us. Our lenders up in Canada, (yes, even those based out of the US) were more conservative than there brethren in the US and required a borrower to have more than a pulse and sufficient body temperature to warrant getting approved for a mortgage.
Did we have true sub-prime lending in Canada? Yes, but only at a few lenders, and always at no more than 95% financing with most preferring to remain at less than 80% financing even on rock-solid properties. The US actually had lenders lending (in some rare cases) up to 125% of the purchase price with the hopes that property prices would continue to rise and put the clients back “into the black” in a few short years. While this strategy allowed clients to roll all their other debts into their mortgage as well, it only worked while prices continued their meteoric rise upwards. When they started to roll back, that was the end for those lenders (and insurers who insured the mortgages).
So where are we going from here? I met with a few other brokers over the weekend and we chatted about where the market is as well as some of the large pull backs in prices we have seen recently. Most of us agree that prices are likely still going to continue downwards for a while, and the fact that money is still getting tighter and tighter and guidelines more and more restricted will only compound this issue in the near future. CMHC is slated to release some new guidelines any time soon, and I suspect that their “Self Employed Simplified” program will disappear or reappear in a far more conservative form. This could make it far more difficult for self employed borrowers who show no income to get qualified. Given the very high percentage of self employed borrowers in BC, this will have a disastrous effect on real estate prices if we are correct. I hope that we aren’t.
So, if prices continue to decline, should you still buy?
The answer depends on your plans:
1. If you intend to buy and hold it for 5 years or more, then yes you should still consider purchasing rather than renting.
2. If you are buying an investment property, I would likely shy away from the Vancouver market in the next year.
3. If you are intending to flip the property, DO NOT get into this market. I have many, many buy-and-flip investors who have purchased properties, poured $100K into them, and cannot sell them for their original purchase price at this point. Buy and flip is not shrewd in this market unless you are buying at a substantial discount and putting essentially no capital into it.
The bottom line is that if you are buying a home, long term, you should always get into the market, buy as much house as you can afford, and let history, scarcity, and payments do the rest for you. You will always come out ahead, and I defy anyone to prove a 10 year period in Canadian history where if you purchased you would have been better off to have rented. That period doesn’t exist, and for that reason, buying property in Vancouver is still a good LONG TERM investment.
Happy hunting!
Tags: 100 percent financing, 100 percent mortgage, 100% financing, 100% mortgage, best mortgage rates canada, canada best mortgage rates, canada best rates, interest rate trends, interest rates, interest rates canada, interest rates vancouver, investmetn property vancouver, mortgage broker vancouver, mortgage real estate, mortgages vancouver real estate, no down payment, no down payment mortgage, prime rate trends, Real Estate, real estate vancouver, vancouver interest rates, vancouver investment property, vancouver mortgage, vancouver mortgage broker, Vancouver Real Estate, vancouver real estate market opinion, zero down, zero down mortgage Posted in Home Buyer Info, Market Commentary | 1 Comment » | 323 views
Thursday, August 28th, 2008
There are several tricks that you can utilize (some with caution) when pricing your home. I usually like to leave pricing of a property up to the realtor that is listing it, but from time to time you may want to provide a bit of your own input. The price of your home is important because it is usually the first thing that a buyer looks for on a MLS Listing. They want to know if your home is in their price range before they even look at the features it possesses. Many buyers simply walk away from homes due to them being poorly priced and/or confusingly priced before the buyer even looks at the property.
The five points I am summarizing below are from www.canadarealtynews.com and I found it to be a fairly good write-up on the issue.
1. PRICE IT RIGHT
In order to set the right price, check out the competition first. This is normally the job of your listing agent who will answer the question: what are similar homes selling for. Note that i wrote “selling for” and not “listed for” because there can be a large difference between the two. You need to look at how long the other properties listed and sold were on the market, what amount of price negotiation took place between list price and final price? (Only your realtor can provide this information as the final sale price is not publically available very easily). Pricing your home lower than the competition may result in many more offers that drives the price higher. Alternatively, pricing it too high may result in buyers walking away or not evening looking at the property due to “sticker shock.”
2. THE MISSING PENNY TRICK
To grab the attention of potential buyers, take a tip from discount retailers like Wal-Mart. For example, $19.99 versus $20.00. While only one penny apart in price, the brain perceives the $19.99 lower due to some psychological reason whereby people make snap judgments based on the the first number they see. As we read from left to right, if we see a 1 instead of a 2, we may, subconsciously, assume that the $19.99 is a better bargain. Therefore, listing a home at $199,999 may generate more business than listing it at $200,000.
3. RAISE THE REFERENCE POINT
If you ask a higher price, people will also instinctively assume that they are getting more value, and you will have raised their reference point. You can affect the reference point of buyers by telling them the selling price of other properties in the area. Use this information with caution however, and only if the comparisons you are drawing are in your favour.
4. SEND THE RIGHT MESSAGE
People associate precise numbers with a bargain. They assume that if you price something at $493,495 that you have thought very carefully about the price of the home and the value you are offering. Setting a round number such as $495,000 conveys openness and a willingness to negotiate. Note, however that setting too specific a price may convey that you are not very open to negotiation as you have a very specific value in mind. Use this trick with caution.
5. MAKE PRICE CUTS EASY TO UNDERSTAND
We perceive easily computable (but smaller) discounts as better than larger (but confusing) discounts. When a home has been on the market for a long time, the logical move is to reduce the asking price, but by how much? The trick here is to reduce the price by an easily computable amount. For example, if you were asking $495,495 you would want to reduce it to $485,485 as this is an easy to calculate $10,000 price reduction. You wouldn’t want to drop it to $478,995 as this is a confusing discount that cannot be easily calculated in one’s head. Make the number nice and easy to calculate so buyers can see how much they are saving easily and without a calculator.
This article was re-printed and summarized from www.Canadarealtynet.com
Tags: 0% down, 40 year ammortization, 40 year mortgage, canada morgage changes, canada mortgage changes, canadian morgage changes, canadian mortgage changes, CMHC changes, faster sell, financing, free down payment, interest rate trends, interest rates, morgage broker vancouver, morgage changes, morgage vancouver, mortgage broker vancouver, mortgage changes, mortgage new, mortgages, no down payment, no down payment mortgage, no money down mortgage, pricing, pricing real estate, pricing your home, prime rate trends, rate trends, rule changes mortgage, sell home, sell home faster, sell real estate faster, vancouver morgage, vancouver morgage broker, vancouver mortgage, vancouver mortgage broker, zero down, zero down mortgage Posted in Market Commentary, Seller Info | No Comments » | 150 views
Tuesday, August 26th, 2008
The mortgage market in Canada is changing. In July CMHC announced that they were making some large changes that are in effect October 15th, 2008 regarding a couple of their most popular programs. I read an article this week that explained that something like 60% of Canadians polled did not understand what the changes to the market were and what possible effect they will have. I am going to highlight the two largest changes that have occurred, and explain what the possible impacts of these changes will be.
The two programs that have been cancelled are:
1. Zero Down Mortgages (No Down Payment Mortgages)
2. 40 Year ammortization (40 year mortgages)
A discussion of both of these programs, and my OPINION on their merits, is long overdue:
ZERO DOWN MORTGAGES
Zero down mortgages have only been available (in the current CMHC form) for around 2 years. There was, and still is, a way to make a purchase with zero down, but the rates are higher, and the product is not as accessible as the current form. Under the current form of a 0% down mortgage, the client does not put a single penny up as down payment. They get the full 100% of the purchase price at the fully discounted rates. There is a large CMHC insurance premium that they have to pay, but they are able to get into the market without having to save up a down payment.
This program is being cancelled so that, effective October 15th, you will need to put 5% up as a down payment.
Now, where does this 5% down payment come from? Well, you can borrow it! You can’t borrow it from the same lender and roll it all neatly into a mortgage, but you can borrow it from friends, family, credit cards, lines of credit, or RRSP balances (this last one is complicated but possible). You could also save up the money by way of RRSPs, stocks, cash, or just organic savings over a long period of time. Lastly, there are a couple lenders that offer a 5% “cashback” at closing that gives you a 5% down payment. Note, however, that they charge a much higher rate to do this, and they will insist on you repaying the 5% gift back if you try and sell the property and pay it out prior to the end of the term.
The government is cancelling this program, and the minister has made several remarks that I disagree with likening both the zero down mortgage and 40 year mortgage to the American Sub Prime problem south of the border. This is far from true. In Canada, to qualify for a zero down mortgage, you need a sterling credit rating, and solid, verifiable, proven income. In the United States, you essentially needed 1 of the 3. Just because we are lending the full amount to the borrower, does not mean we (in Canada) are doing so all willy-nilly. In fact, there is an even greater level of scrutiny given to borrowers with zero down, and an even greater level of conservatism with respect to how the banks treat the borrower’s income and credit. Although the data doesn’t exist yet, I suspect that zero down borrowers will be no less attentive to their mortgage payments than borrowers with 5% down. While this is, currently, just my opinion, I believe history will support my opinion. Just because someone put 0% down (instead of 5% down) does not mean they will just up and walk away from the home when the going gets tough. People don’t walk away from their homes unless they have no choice and the 5% vs 0% will do little to prevent this as legal costs of a foreclosure will eat up the 5% in just a couple months.
40 YEAR AMMORTIZATION (40 YEAR MORTGAGES)
Many people gasped and poo-pooed when the 40 year mortgage was announced. Sayings like, “I don’t want a mortgage when I’m 75″ and “you’ll never pay that off” could be heard from many people’s lips (both from outside and within the industry). The reality is that no one will take 40 years to pay off their mortgage, and some common sense should apply here. Also, by cancelling the 40 year, but not the 35 year, the government hasn’t done much as the biggest savings in payments happens when you go from 25 to 35 years and the payment decrease on a 40 year mortgage from a 35 year mortgage is negligible.
What a 40 year mortgage does is:
a. Reduces monthly cash flow
b. Lets a buyer get more house for his money
c. Lets a buyer get into a home he couldn’t otherwise afford
At first blush, C above may sound like, “if he can’t afford it, why buy it?” but the reality is that housing is damned expensive in Vancouver, and we as a society want people to get into property, own their home, and start building equity. It is the only long-term plan for wealth creation that pretty much everyone agrees on. Also, property prices always, in the long run, appreciate, and therefore if we can get a buyer into a home with a lower monthly payment, SURE they’ll only be paying a small amount off each month, but over the years their property will appreciate far faster than they pay it off.
Also, I challenge you to show me one person whose situation is so stable that they will sit with their mortgage for 40 years. Consider this: if you imagine your payments today as an even $1,000 and your income as $50,000 a year, then you are using 24% of your gross income to pay your mortgage. This is a very manageable number. Now, fast forward 5 years, and assuming you took a 5 year term, will your income still be only $50,000 a year? What about 10 years out? 15? Your mortgage payments will remain (relatively) unchanged, and your income will (in most cases) rise throughout your life making that $1,000 seem less and less when considered as a percentage of your income. How long before you start doubling-down on your payments, making lump sums, or paying it off faster? Even more common: how long before your personal situation changes: you get married, you have a child, or worse, get divorced? These are changes that happen in a person’s life, and the 40 year mortgage lets you control (through leverage) a large asset, benefit from its appreciation, minimize the cash flow out each month to hold that property, and afford the other things in life you need to pay for such as education, car payments etc…
The argument that the 40 year mortgage and zero down mortgage contribute to a sub prime style mortgage market does not hold water with me. The government has made these changes, and waxed on and on about how they support the healthy growth of the mortgage market in Canada. However, the 40 year mortgage versus the 35 year mortgage (which is still around) is not that material. Let’s look at how small of a difference a 40 year mortgage versus a 35 year mortgage makes on a $200,000 mortgage assuming 5.25% semi-annual interest:
40 Year payment is $990.17
35 Year Payment is 1,034.19
Difference is $44.02 per month! This small amount, in my opinion, does little to strengthen the Canadian mortgage market, and does little to pay off the mortgage faster. After 5 years, with a 35 year mortgage your balance would be only $2,641.20 lower. Hardly worth squabbling over, when you consider the size of the numbers we are dealing with.
If the government was seriously committed to this action of strengthening the market, they would either leave the programs as they are, or wind back the clock to the 25 or 30 year mortgage. THAT would have a material effect, but they are likely also afraid of the impact that such a move would have on the economy as homeowners that bought their home in the last two years won’t be able to qualify for the property they currently own. The results could be disastrous. Instead, they’ve changed two very small programs that only a peripheral number of people need. I guess my final thought is: why bother?
So there it is. The two changes the government is making along with my personal thoughts and opinions on the changes.
Tags: 0% down, 40 year ammortization, 40 year mortgage, canada morgage changes, canada mortgage changes, canadian morgage changes, canadian mortgage changes, CMHC changes, financing, free down payment, interest rate trends, interest rates, morgage broker vancouver, morgage changes, morgage vancouver, mortgage broker vancouver, mortgage changes, mortgage new, mortgages, no down payment, no down payment mortgage, no money down mortgage, prime rate trends, rate trends, rule changes mortgage, vancouver morgage, vancouver morgage broker, vancouver mortgage, vancouver mortgage broker, zero down, zero down mortgage Posted in Home Buyer Info, Market Commentary, Refinance | No Comments » | 203 views
|
|
|