Rowan Smith is an independent Vancouver Mortgage Broker with The Mortgage Centre - Citywide.
read more >
MORTGAGES VANCOUVER  
Tips, Advice, and Explanations from a Vancouver Mortgage Broker  

Posts Tagged ‘no down payment’

No Money Down Mortgage / Zero Down Mortgage

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

Most of the public is unaware that no down payment or zero down mortgages still exist. On October 15, 2008 the rules passed by Canada’s finance minister took effect, and the existing no money down program was canceled. However, only that one program was canceled.

There IS another way…

There are a few banks that will “give” you 5% of the purchase price allowing you to get 95% financing. This program is called “flex down” and here is how it works:

1. You pay posted rates instead of discounted

2. The cash is given to you at closing allowing you to put it as the 5% down payment

3. You need to show cash assets of 1.5% of the purchase price of the home to prove you can afford to close on the transaction

4. Still need a deposit!

5. You pay higher CMHC fees

POSTED RATES:

In mortgages, as in all other elements of business there is no such thing as a free lunch. The 5 year posted rate is 5.49% as of today, with discounted rates in the 3.89% range. You will need to pay the higher 5.49% rate. This way, the bank recoups it’s 5% gift of money that it gave to you over the 5 year term. And yes, you MUST take a 5 year fixed term. It doesn’t matter if you only want a 3 year, or a variable rate, you MUST take a 5 year fixed term at posted rates. In this way, the bank is getting the 5% back from you spread out over the 5 years.

Think of it as forced savings of the 5%, but you get to live in the home while you save!
CASH GIVEN AT CLOSING

The 5% cash gets sent to the lawyer’s office handling the transaction. Then, the mortgage money shows up for the other 95% and the house is yours!
NEED TO SHOW 1.5% CASH ASSETS

The bank needs to know that if they give you the 5% that you can still put up some money to cover property transfer tax (if applicable), move in costs, utility transfers, etc… WITHOUT borrowing the money. You’ll need to show 1.5% of the purchase price of the home in an account in your name. How it got there isn’t an issue. It just has to be in your account.
STILL NEED A DEPOSIT

When you write an offer, you will still need to have money to give as a deposit. This is generally considered “good faith money” as it is non-refundable. Typically, it is customary for the deposit to be 5% of the purchase price. However, this is just CUSTOMARY. You need to tell your realtor that you need the deposit loan as low as possible ($1,000 or $5,000) and you need to be able to write this cheque! You can get it on a visa cash advance, borrow it from friends or family, or what have you.

Remember, you will get it back at the closing date when the bank’s 5% shows up but you still need it in the interim and this is an often forgotten element to no money down purchases.
HIGHER CMHC FEES

Whenever you put less than 20% down on a purchase you face CMHC fees. They are government mandated fees, and you can find out more about them and what they are by doing a search on my blog for “CMHC fees” as I’ve written several articles explaining them.

When you do a “flex down” purchase or no money down, the CMHC fees are 2.90% base instead of 2.75% base and they are BUILT INTO THE MORTGAGE – meaning you don’t have to write a cheque for them up front.

THAT’S IT!

I’m working on two of these deals for clients as I type this blog entry, and both are getting approved. So, if someone says zero down or no money down mortgage isn’t available, give them my contact info and I’ll get them set up!

Thanks again, and happy house hunting!

Vancouver Real Estate Market – POST Fed Bailout

Monday, October 6th, 2008

So I haven’t posted in over a week, and it’s been because i’ve had my head down working like a dog while reeling from the effects of the last week’s meltdown in the financial sector. Finally, after an up and down week, and Fed in the US approved the bailout. You would think that this is great news for the real estate industry, right?

I’m not so sure. What this plan effectively did is nationalize a private problem. There is a saying somewhere that when profits are made they are private, but when losses are taken, they’re public. I know that isn’t a direct quote, but it is close enough to get the gist of it. It is also very very true. So long as the market continued along unabated, with profits being made, private investors got to keep all their profits, spend it as they wished, and not have to pay anything other than taxes. When the problems set in, and the investors all stood to lose a lot of money, enter the Fed and a massive public bailout that effectively increases the national debt that took them over 100 years to build by 10% in a single blow. I don’t like the precedent that this sets, and hope that the bailout doesn’t totally bail out all the lenders and institutions that acted irresponsibly over the past 8 years. That said, I also don’t want the market to go into a tailspin and melt down.

A lot of the price appreciation we have seen in Vancouver Real Estate in the past few years is driven by the market being very desirable to live in, own in, and even rent in. As a result, prices have (and should have) risen. However, as someone on the front lines of mortgages and real estate, I DO think that prices have gotten ahead of value, and we are in for a correction.

Unlike the United States market, however, I do NOT think that prices will come crashing down around us. Our lenders up in Canada, (yes, even those based out of the US) were more conservative than there brethren in the US and required a borrower to have more than a pulse and sufficient body temperature to warrant getting approved for a mortgage.

Did we have true sub-prime lending in Canada? Yes, but only at a few lenders, and always at no more than 95% financing with most preferring to remain at less than 80% financing even on rock-solid properties. The US actually had lenders lending (in some rare cases) up to 125% of the purchase price with the hopes that property prices would continue to rise and put the clients back “into the black” in a few short years. While this strategy allowed clients to roll all their other debts into their mortgage as well, it only worked while prices continued their meteoric rise upwards. When they started to roll back, that was the end for those lenders (and insurers who insured the mortgages).

So where are we going from here? I met with a few other brokers over the weekend and we chatted about where the market is as well as some of the large pull backs in prices we have seen recently. Most of us agree that prices are likely still going to continue downwards for a while, and the fact that money is still getting tighter and tighter and guidelines more and more restricted will only compound this issue in the near future. CMHC is slated to release some new guidelines any time soon, and I suspect that their “Self Employed Simplified” program will disappear or reappear in a far more conservative form. This could make it far more difficult for self employed borrowers who show no income to get qualified. Given the very high percentage of self employed borrowers in BC, this will have a disastrous effect on real estate prices if we are correct. I hope that we aren’t.

So, if prices continue to decline, should you still buy?

The answer depends on your plans:

1. If you intend to buy and hold it for 5 years or more, then yes you should still consider purchasing rather than renting.

2. If you are buying an investment property, I would likely shy away from the Vancouver market in the next year.

3. If you are intending to flip the property, DO NOT get into this market. I have many, many buy-and-flip investors who have purchased properties, poured $100K into them, and cannot sell them for their original purchase price at this point. Buy and flip is not shrewd in this market unless you are buying at a substantial discount and putting essentially no capital into it.

The bottom line is that if you are buying a home, long term, you should always get into the market, buy as much house as you can afford, and let history, scarcity, and payments do the rest for you. You will always come out ahead, and I defy anyone to prove a 10 year period in Canadian history where if you purchased you would have been better off to have rented. That period doesn’t exist, and for that reason, buying property in Vancouver is still a good LONG TERM investment.

Happy hunting!

No Down Payment Mortgage – How to Buy a Home with Zero Down

Tuesday, September 23rd, 2008

When CMHC announced they were cancelling the Zero Down program and 40 Year Mortgage, I heard one mortgage broker remark that it was the beginning of the real estate recession. I first scoffed at his comment, but then had an absolute ton of applications for both of these product along with many, many, many applications that did not qualify. There was a rush of people trying to get in under both programs, and it was clear that a lot of people had assumed the zero down program or No Money Down Mortgage program would still be around. I also made this assumption.

So HOW DO YOU GET A NO MONEY DOWN MORTGAGE now that the rules have changed?

Prior to the current zero down program, there WERE other ways to buy with no down payment. Originally it was called “Flex Down” and this program allowed you (at the expense of a slightly higher CMHC fee) to borrow your down payment from a credit card, personal loan, family, or through a lender cashback incentive offer. This program still exists! However, there are a couple of rules:

1. Just having the required 5% down payment does not mean you qualify. You still need to prove adequate income and credit history. If you are borrowing the down payment, you can expect your bank to be extra strict on what they will or will not allow.

2. If you get the downpayment in the form of a cashback from your lender (For example, Scotiabank has a 5% cashback program where they will gift you the down payment) you can expect the following:

- A higher rate than everyone else with a saved up down payment is getting
- Harsh penalties if you break the term of the mortgage (maybe an extra large penalty)
- Forced repayment of the cashback if you sell the property or break the term of the mortgage

An example of how this looks is as follows. Let’s say you see a condo for $400,000 in downtown Vancouver that you like. You have a good job, great credit, no other debts, and you want to see what sort of terms are available.

OPTION #1 – Cashback mortgage

Under this option, the bank will GIVE YOU 5% of the purchase price (in this case $20,000) at the closing of your purchase that you can use this as the 5% down payment. Instead of the 5.50% that everyone else is able to get, you will be paying 6.70% instead. This will pay the bank back for their gift of $20,000 over the life of the mortgage. Therefore, your payments will be higher. In this case you will be paying $2,402 per month instead of the $2,090 that you would be paying if you had saved up the down payment. That is $312 more because you got the gifted downpayment from the bank. $312 x 60 months in a term = $18,720 which essentially repays the bank over the term of the mortgage. Should you pay out the mortgage early, you may face a longer than 3 month interest penalty (6 months, for example) and you will likely have to repay the bank the 5% gift they gave you. These are standard terms, and you will NOT be able to avoid them no matter how long you have banked there, or how much your family has with them. There is no free lunch in this game, and you can expect fees.

OPTION #2 – Borrowed Downpayment

Under this option, you will borrow the down payment from a visa or loan at whatever rate they charge (could be as high as 19% or more!) BUT… and this is a big “but”… you will get to borrow the rest of the mortgage at the fully discounted 5.5% rate. Most people will take an interest only line of credit at, say, 9.75% for the $20,000 needed and borrow the rest fully discounted at 5.50%. Under this scenario you would face the following payments:

$162.50             Payment on Line of Credit
$2,094 Payment on mortgage
$2,256.60

So, compare this to the payment of a gifted cashback downpayment versus a saved downpayment versus the current (but cancelled) zero down payment program. Here is the comparison:

$2,211.00                   Current program (being cancelled Oct 15th, 2008)
$2,090.00                   Saved Down Payment
$2,256.60                   Borrowed Down Payment
$2,402.00                   Gifted / Cashback Down Payment

So clearly, it is cheaper to save the down payment, but not everyone can do that. The next best option is to borrow it, but not everyone has th credit score to pull this off. Lastly, you can do a cashback mortgage, but even this requires a certain level of credit and income that not everyone has. However, these are three options for a no down payment mortgage that existed before the current program came into effect, and all will remain after the current program is cancelled.

So, in summary, zero down and the no down payment mortgage IS still available despite the CMHC rules changes. If you are having trouble obtaining financing, please let me know and I will make sure we set you up appropriately.

Pricing tricks to sell your home FASTER

Thursday, August 28th, 2008

There are several tricks that you can utilize (some with caution) when pricing your home. I usually like to leave pricing of a property up to the realtor that is listing it, but from time to time you may want to provide a bit of your own input. The price of your home is important because it is usually the first thing that a buyer looks for on a MLS Listing. They want to know if your home is in their price range before they even look at the features it possesses. Many buyers simply walk away from homes due to them being poorly priced and/or confusingly priced before the buyer even looks at the property.

The five points I am summarizing below are from www.canadarealtynews.com and I found it to be a fairly good write-up on the issue.

1. PRICE IT RIGHT

In order to set the right price, check out the competition first. This is normally the job of your listing agent who will answer the question: what are similar homes selling for. Note that i wrote “selling for” and not “listed for” because there can be a large difference between the two. You need to look at how long the other properties listed and sold were on the market, what amount of price negotiation took place between list price and final price? (Only your realtor can provide this information as the final sale price is not publically available very easily). Pricing your home lower than the competition may result in many more offers that drives the price higher. Alternatively, pricing it too high may result in buyers walking away or not evening looking at the property due to “sticker shock.”

2. THE MISSING PENNY TRICK

To grab the attention of potential buyers, take a tip from discount retailers like Wal-Mart. For example, $19.99 versus $20.00. While only one penny apart in price, the brain perceives the $19.99 lower due to some psychological reason whereby people make snap judgments based on the the first number they see. As we read from left to right, if we see a 1 instead of a 2, we may, subconsciously, assume that the $19.99 is a better bargain. Therefore, listing a home at $199,999 may generate more business than listing it at $200,000.

3. RAISE THE REFERENCE POINT

If you ask a higher price, people will also instinctively assume that they are getting more value, and you will have raised their reference point. You can affect the reference point of buyers by telling them the selling price of other properties in the area. Use this information with caution however, and only if the comparisons you are drawing are in your favour.

4. SEND THE RIGHT MESSAGE

People associate precise numbers with a bargain. They assume that if you price something at $493,495 that you have thought very carefully about the price of the home and the value you are offering. Setting a round number such as $495,000 conveys openness and a willingness to negotiate. Note, however that setting too specific a price may convey that you are not very open to negotiation as you have a very specific value in mind. Use this trick with caution.

5. MAKE PRICE CUTS EASY TO UNDERSTAND

We perceive easily computable (but smaller) discounts as better than larger (but confusing) discounts. When a home has been on the market for a long time, the logical move is to reduce the asking price, but by how much? The trick here is to reduce the price by an easily computable amount. For example, if you were asking $495,495 you would want to reduce it to $485,485 as this is an easy to calculate $10,000 price reduction. You wouldn’t want to drop it to $478,995 as this is a confusing discount that cannot be easily calculated in one’s head. Make the number nice and easy to calculate so buyers can see how much they are saving easily and without a calculator.

This article was re-printed and summarized from www.Canadarealtynet.com

Canadian Mortgage Changes – CMHC Mortgage Rule Changes

Tuesday, August 26th, 2008

The mortgage market in Canada is changing. In July CMHC announced that they were making some large changes that are in effect October 15th, 2008 regarding a couple of their most popular programs. I read an article this week that explained that something like 60% of Canadians polled did not understand what the changes to the market were and what possible effect they will have. I am going to highlight the two largest changes that have occurred, and explain what the possible impacts of these changes will be.

The two programs that have been cancelled are:

1. Zero Down Mortgages (No Down Payment Mortgages)

2. 40 Year ammortization (40 year mortgages)

A discussion of both of these programs, and my OPINION on their merits, is long overdue:
ZERO DOWN MORTGAGES

Zero down mortgages have only been available (in the current CMHC form) for around 2 years. There was, and still is, a way to make a purchase with zero down, but the rates are higher, and the product is not as accessible as the current form. Under the current form of a 0% down mortgage, the client does not put a single penny up as down payment. They get the full 100% of the purchase price at the fully discounted rates. There is a large CMHC insurance premium that they have to pay, but they are able to get into the market without having to save up a down payment.

This program is being cancelled so that, effective October 15th, you will need to put 5% up as a down payment.

Now, where does this 5% down payment come from? Well, you can borrow it! You can’t borrow it from the same lender and roll it all neatly into a mortgage, but you can borrow it from friends, family, credit cards, lines of credit, or RRSP balances (this last one is complicated but possible). You could also save up the money by way of RRSPs, stocks, cash, or just organic savings over a long period of time. Lastly, there are a couple lenders that offer a 5% “cashback” at closing that gives you a 5% down payment. Note, however, that they charge a much higher rate to do this, and they will insist on you repaying the 5% gift back if you try and sell the property and pay it out prior to the end of the term.

The government is cancelling this program, and the minister has made several remarks that I disagree with likening both the zero down mortgage and 40 year mortgage to the American Sub Prime problem south of the border. This is far from true. In Canada, to qualify for a zero down mortgage, you need a sterling credit rating, and solid, verifiable, proven income. In the United States, you essentially needed 1 of the 3. Just because we are lending the full amount to the borrower, does not mean we (in Canada) are doing so all willy-nilly. In fact, there is an even greater level of scrutiny given to borrowers with zero down, and an even greater level of conservatism with respect to how the banks treat the borrower’s income and credit. Although the data doesn’t exist yet, I suspect that zero down borrowers will be no less attentive to their mortgage payments than borrowers with 5% down. While this is, currently, just my opinion, I believe history will support my opinion. Just because someone put 0% down (instead of 5% down) does not mean they will just up and walk away from the home when the going gets tough. People don’t walk away from their homes unless they have no choice and the 5% vs 0% will do little to prevent this as legal costs of a foreclosure will eat up the 5% in just a couple months.
40 YEAR AMMORTIZATION (40 YEAR MORTGAGES)

Many people gasped and poo-pooed when the 40 year mortgage was announced. Sayings like, “I don’t want a mortgage when I’m 75″ and “you’ll never pay that off” could be heard from many people’s lips (both from outside and within the industry). The reality is that no one will take 40 years to pay off their mortgage, and some common sense should apply here. Also, by cancelling the 40 year, but not the 35 year, the government hasn’t done much as the biggest savings in payments happens when you go from 25 to 35 years and the payment decrease on a 40 year mortgage from a 35 year mortgage is negligible.

What a 40 year mortgage does is:
a. Reduces monthly cash flow
b. Lets a buyer get more house for his money
c. Lets a buyer get into a home he couldn’t otherwise afford

At first blush, C above may sound like, “if he can’t afford it, why buy it?” but the reality is that housing is damned expensive in Vancouver, and we as a society want people to get into property, own their home, and start building equity. It is the only long-term plan for wealth creation that pretty much everyone agrees on. Also, property prices always, in the long run, appreciate, and therefore if we can get a buyer into a home with a lower monthly payment, SURE they’ll only be paying a small amount off each month, but over the years their property will appreciate far faster than they pay it off.

Also, I challenge you to show me one person whose situation is so stable that they will sit with their mortgage for 40 years. Consider this: if you imagine your payments today as an even $1,000 and your income as $50,000 a year, then you are using 24% of your gross income to pay your mortgage. This is a very manageable number. Now, fast forward 5 years, and assuming you took a 5 year term, will your income still be only $50,000 a year? What about 10 years out? 15? Your mortgage payments will remain (relatively) unchanged, and your income will (in most cases) rise throughout your life making that $1,000 seem less and less when considered as a percentage of your income. How long before you start doubling-down on your payments, making lump sums, or paying it off faster? Even more common: how long before your personal situation changes: you get married, you have a child, or worse, get divorced? These are changes that happen in a person’s life, and the 40 year mortgage lets you control (through leverage) a large asset, benefit from its appreciation, minimize the cash flow out each month to hold that property, and afford the other things in life you need to pay for such as education, car payments etc…

The argument that the 40 year mortgage and zero down mortgage contribute to a sub prime style mortgage market does not hold water with me. The government has made these changes, and waxed on and on about how they support the healthy growth of the mortgage market in Canada. However, the 40 year mortgage versus the 35 year mortgage (which is still around) is not that material. Let’s look at how small of a difference a 40 year mortgage versus a 35 year mortgage makes on a $200,000 mortgage assuming 5.25% semi-annual interest:

40 Year payment is $990.17
35 Year Payment is 1,034.19

Difference is $44.02 per month! This small amount, in my opinion, does little to strengthen the Canadian mortgage market, and does little to pay off the mortgage faster. After 5 years, with a 35 year mortgage your balance would be only $2,641.20 lower. Hardly worth squabbling over, when you consider the size of the numbers we are dealing with.

If the government was seriously committed to this action of strengthening the market, they would either leave the programs as they are, or wind back the clock to the 25 or 30 year mortgage. THAT would have a material effect, but they are likely also afraid of the impact that such a move would have on the economy as homeowners that bought their home in the last two years won’t be able to qualify for the property they currently own. The results could be disastrous. Instead, they’ve changed two very small programs that only a peripheral number of people need. I guess my final thought is: why bother?

So there it is. The two changes the government is making along with my personal thoughts and opinions on the changes.